Blog Authors

Latest from Of Arms & the Law

Especially when I reflect that my son was regional director of Trump Force 47 when he died.

From a fundraising email of Everytown:

“We’re approaching 100 days of this second Trump presidency and the assault on gun safety has been fast and blistering.

Already, Trump’s administration has:

Threatened common-sense measures that keep us safe like Engaged In the Business and Arms Brace

Created a Second Amendment Task Force with the intent to repeal every policy that has kept us safe

Repealed “Zero Tolerance”–a life-saving policy that revoked the licenses of gun dealers who willfully violated federal law, including those who
Continue Reading Makes a person feel good

Story here. I dunno how significant the cert denials actually are, though. One concerns carry by 18 to 20 year olds, the other possession on a college campus. The Court might just have felt that these issues were too narrow to merit review. The last time I checked, the Court was getting around 10,000 petitions per Term, and taking under a hundred of them. These petitions may just not have made it to the top.
Continue Reading SCOTUS ducks gun cases for now

An interesting question. The article suggests that between the party’s internal fragmentation, its members’ perception of a need for a change, Hogg’s hopes to primary a ton of moderates, and someone falling heir to Bernie Sanders’ network of donors and supporters, the party will likely go further “woke” when it should be heading the other way.

(We need a better title for “the other side.” Traditionally, they are called “the left,” but their core beliefs have almost nothing to do with left-vs-right. I mean — what did Karl Marx have to say about which bathroom a tranny male should
Continue Reading Did David Hogg and AOC murder the Demo Party?

GoA v. ATF, DC District Court. GoA filed a FOIA lawsuit, “seeking records about a secret government surveillance program which unlawfully and unconstitutionally monitors and records the firearm purchases of American citizens who are perfectly eligible to purchase and possess firearms.”

ATF disclosed some records, then discovered that it had disclosed some it meant to keep secret, and it got a protective order from the court forbidding GoA to publicize them. GOA, thru Stephen Stamboulieh, now moves to lift the protective order. Here’s another note from the motion:

“As Plaintiffs explained, the NICS Monitoring Program underlying Plaintiffs’ FOIA request
Continue Reading GoA Hits Gold in FOIA Suit

I’ve not posted in a while, just thought to mention the reason. My elder son, Mark William Hardy, was hospitalized on Nov. 3, and died on Dec. 3. I spent that time sitting in one or another ICU and was too distracted to blog. I still am.
Continue Reading My silence

Barnett v. Raoul, S. D. Ill. The beginning is unusual, and the end is wonderful:

“Most importantly, considering all of the evidence presented, the Court holds that the provisions of PICA criminalizing the knowing possession of specific semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, magazines, and attachments are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment. Therefore, the Plaintiffs’ request for a permanent injunction is GRANTED. The State of Illinois is hereby ENJOINED
from the enforcement of PICA’s criminal penalties in accordance with 720 ILL. COMP. STAT. §§ 5/24-1(a)(14)-(16) (bump stocks and
Continue Reading A good decision from the Southern District of Illinois

The Supreme Court is keeping busy on gun matters! It just granted S&W’s petition for certiorari. The government of Mexico had sued a large group of gun companies over guns being smuggled in, the companies pled the Lawful Commerce etc. Act, but the First Circuit upheld the suit on the grounds that the Act doesn’t protect aiding and abetting of crimes.

The companies point out that aiding and abetting requires more than selling a product that some buyers will misuse; a beer manufacturer does not aid and abet a drunk driver or an underage drinker.
Continue Reading Cert granted in Mexico vs. S&W case

The case is Garland v. VanDerStok, No. 23-852. Here’s the transcript of argument. The government’s argument was brief and not interrupted by questions. Then came a lot of questions, and only Gorsuch seemed to be doubting the government position (see pp. 20-30), though Jackson raised some interesting questions (see pp. 53-56).

A good summary is at SCOTUSblog. The author thinks the regulation will be upheld.
Continue Reading Oral argument in gun kit — "ghost guns" — Supreme Court case

An interesting article by Tom Knighton.

Related, since the discussion is of the “well-regulated militia” clause, my article in the Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy. I contend that the right to arms clause and the militia clause had different origins and different constituencies, and were not joined together until very late in the constitution-drafting game. One does not govern the other, anymore than that freedom to petition the government proves that freedom of speech and press are limited to critiques of government policy.
Continue Reading "How facts get misrepresented to push an anti-gun narrative"