K–12 schools operate within a complex legal and regulatory landscape when responding to Title IX reports. While the federal regulatory framework applies to both K–12 and higher education, K-12 school districts face unique considerations related to student age, parental involvement, and mandatory reporting requirements. This blog highlights the foundational elements of Title IX in K–12 settings and the unique factors schools must navigate when addressing allegations of sexual harassment. Title IX Requirements in K–12 SettingsThe 2020 Title IX regulations are in effect and outline how schools must respond to Title IX sexual harassment. Key requirements include:Role Separation

• The investigator and

…
Continue Reading Understanding Title IX in K–12 Schools: Key Requirements and Unique Challenges

You walk into the interview room feeling ready. Your questions are set. The space is calm. The timing is perfect.But two minutes in, everything changes.Your interviewee’s eyes well up. Or they snap in frustration. Or they freeze, suddenly unable to speak. Whatever you expected, this wasn’t it.That’s the moment every investigator faces the reality: you can plan the interview, but you cannot script the person.We ask people to revisit moments that are painful, awkward, or deeply personal—and their reactions can be understandably intense. Tears, anger, silence, feeling overwhelmed…it’s all part of the terrain.Below are practical ways to stay neutral, steady,…
Continue Reading Managing Emotionally Charged Interviews

It started innocently enough—a weekly team check-in, the kind everyone has been on a hundred times since remote work became the norm. Cameras flickered on, the agenda was shared, and someone joked about “another day, another Zoom.” But within minutes, a few small lapses of judgment turned an ordinary meeting into a lesson in digital decorum—and legal exposure. We have all seen it:

• The Accidental Audience: When the project manager forgets to mute herself—and everyone hears her vent about her supervisor in real time.
• The Background That Speaks Volumes: When the analyst’s camera turns on with an unmade bed and

…
Continue Reading Boom on Zoom: The Perils of Virtual Misconduct

Workplace investigators conduct investigations of all kinds. One that raises special issues involves pronoun misuse. A November 2024 report from the UCLA School of Law Williams Institute found that 82% of transgender employees experienced discrimination or harassment in the workplace at some point in their lives because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.[1] Sixty-five percent of transgender employees reported experiencing verbal harassment based on their sexual orientation or gender identity, including being persistently misgendered.[2] Transgender and gender-nonconforming employees may face unique challenges that their cisgender counterparts do not, including being referred to by the incorrect pronouns. Pronouns—such…
Continue Reading Investigating Claims of Pronoun Misuse in the Workplace

When conducting workplace investigations involving first responders, investigators must navigate unique legal requirements under California’s Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights (POBR) and Firefighter Bill of Rights (FBOR).  These statutes guide investigations into police and firefighter misconduct. They impose stricter procedural requirements than standard employment investigations, with critical notice and admonition requirements for Respondents accused of misconduct.   Critical Timing and Strategic ConsiderationsBefore considering specific requirements, investigators must be acutely aware of statutory deadlines. Both POBR and FBOR impose a one-year statute of limitations from discovery of alleged misconduct for employers to notify employees of potential discipline. Therefore, investigators should…
Continue Reading Respondent Notices and Admonitions Under POBR and FBOR: You Should Sweat The Small Stuff

Nearly a third of American workers have been bullied at work, according to a 2024 survey by the Workplace Bullying Institute (WBI).  Thirty-two percent of respondents in the WBI survey reported experiencing “abusive conduct that is threatening, intimidating, or humiliating; work sabotage or verbal abuse” in their current job or work history.  Such bullying not only affects the employees involved, but also creates challenges for employers and workplace investigators.  Claims of bullying are different from allegations of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, which implicate specific employment laws.  By contrast, bullying is not prohibited under federal or state law, so there is…
Continue Reading Bullying Investigations: Key Considerations for Workplace Investigators

Our neutral, fact-finding investigations are most commonly detailed tools that enable employers to make employment decisions. It is therefore critical we remain up-to-date regarding the changing legal landscape to understand which facts are relevant to reaching an informed decision. While we investigate a variety of employment-related concerns, a specific form of retaliation, known as whistleblower retaliation, sometimes crosses our desks. What is Whistleblower Retaliation? Whistleblower retaliation occurs when an employer takes negative employment action against an employee who reported conduct by their employer that they reasonably believe is against the law. In California, Labor Code Section 1102.5 (California’s whistleblower statute)…
Continue Reading Who Are Considered “Employees” With the Right to Sue Under California’s Whistleblower Statute? According to the California Supreme Court, Not Elected Officials.

Read the Article

Permalink
Continue Reading Anti-Corruption Report: Why Modern Corporations Need Investigative Memory

In an era wherein social media is omnipresent, employees, like everyone, post myriad opinions on widespread topics across their social media platforms.  Employers may receive complaints related to their employees’ social media activity and have to decide whether discipline is appropriate.  While the First Amendment does not restrain private employers from restricting employee speech, the First Amendment does place some restraints on government employers’ ability to do so.  However, this does not mean that a government employee’s right to freedom of speech is without limitations. As neutral investigators, we do not advise or make decisions regarding whether government employers should…
Continue Reading Employees’ Social Media Posts And The First Amendment: What Is A Government Employer To Do?

In today’s fast-paced corporate environment, what begins as a workplace grievance can sometimes uncover something equally or even more consequential.  Consider this.  You are a healthcare institution, employing 8,000 employees in the Midwest, generating between $50–100 million annually.  You received a complaint from a 10-year employee, citing bullying and unfair treatment related to gender. You begin the investigation, and the story takes a twist. You find a deeply hidden financial fraud scheme. This case not only highlights the value of structured investigations but also underscores how behavioral red flags and credibility assessments can open the door to deeper organizational risks.Initial…
Continue Reading Case Study: Conducting Workplace Investigations That Uncover Hidden Financial Fraud Risks

How External Investigators Evaluate “Conduct Unbecoming” CasesEmployee discipline in “at-will” employment is fairly simple—an employee can be disciplined for any reason or no reason, just not for an unlawful reason (race, sex, religion, whistleblower retaliation, etc.).  In public employment and unionized workplaces, however, the dynamic is different.  Due process rights and collective bargaining agreements usually mean discipline can only be imposed “for cause.”  This puts employers and rule-makers in the position of having to list, justify, and possibly negotiate what “for cause” means.  As a practical matter, there is no list comprehensive or exhaustive enough to cover every conceivable act…
Continue Reading This Looks Bad

Organizations lose approximately $3.6 billion annually to fraud, with median losses reaching $250,000 per incident. What’s more concerning is that these schemes often go undetected for an average of 18 months, causing significant financial damage and lasting reputational harm.The Fraud Triangle—a proven framework examining pressure, opportunity, and rationalization—offers organizations a practical approach to understand, prevent, and detect fraudulent activities before substantial damage occurs.The Fraud Triangle ExplainedThe Fraud Triangle breaks down the three essential elements typically present when fraud occurs: Pressure Pressure is what often drives individuals to commit fraud. Pressure can stem from personal financial hardships, addictions, demanding performance…
Continue Reading Preventing Financial Fraud: How the Fraud Triangle Framework Can Protect Your Organization

This month’s VM Recommends brings us selections from Senior Attorney Investigator and Adjudicator, Christina Petricca.What is a book you would recommend? I read Kristin Hannah’s The Nightingale a while ago and it is still one of my favorite books.  The Nightingale is a historical fiction that describes the difficulties faced by two sisters during World War II. The book moves between present day and the past and each chapter leaves you hanging to find out what happens next. I’ve read several of Kristin Hannah’s books and I really enjoy her writing style. What is your favorite place to visit…
Continue Reading VM Recommends – Bay Area Edition