A contractor can be disciplined for, according to
A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(20)
“having a person named on the license who is or was named on any other license in this state or in another state that is under suspension or revocation for any act or omission that occurs while the person is or was named on the license.”
Why that is bad: If someone serves as the QP on their “buddy’s” license, while simultaneously being the QP for their own company, their own company could be disciplined because of the discipline imposed on the other license.
Additionally, unresolved discipline from a previous license can prevent the QP from obtaining a new license.
A.R.S. § 32-1122
(C) requires that each person named on a license:
“must be of good character and reputation. Lack of good character and reputation may be established by showing that … the person was named on a license that was suspended or revoked in this state or another state.”
Even if the discipline occurred years prior, it can still prevent a new license from being issued.
If, after weighing the risks and rewards, you are still inclined to serve as QP for another contractor’s license, these steps can reduce your risk of administrative liability:
Before becoming the qualifying party, perform due diligence on the licensee. If the company has a disciplinary history, proceed with caution.
Don’t be a “silent” QP. Do your job, and appropriately supervise the licensee.
If, in your supervision, you detect conduct or workmanship that heightens the risk of discipline to the license, disassociate yourself promptly and officially.
. Because complaining parties have two years to pursue discipline against a contractor’s license, a
QP may be responsible for up to two years
after disassociation. If you disassociate, you will not receive notices of complaints filed against the license; consequently, you could be affected without knowing about it until you apply for a new license or renewal.