Labor and Employment
COVID-19’s Implications for OSHA and the NLRA
May 7, 2021
Recent news regarding the COVID-19 pandemic brings long-awaited optimism as signs of improvement begin to show. According to recent statistics from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 40.7% of the Arizona population has received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with 28.9% being fully vaccinated. The number of confirmed cases and deaths related to COVID-19 continues to decline as well. As conditions seem to improve, businesses are eager to re-open their doors and bring back their workforce in an effort to return to “normal.” However, employers must be wary not to run afoul of key health and safety protections in doing so.
Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) and the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA), employees are entitled to certain protections in the workplace.
Under OSHA, employers are required to provide their employees with a work environment “free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm.” With President Joe Biden’s administration, employers can expect heightened OSHA enforcement activity related to COVID-19 exposures and expect more aggressive OSHA investigations of such claims.
On January 21, 2020, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety directing the Secretary of Labor, among other things, to launch a National Emphasis Program (NEP) to focus OSHA enforcement efforts related to COVID-19 on violations that put the largest number of workers at serious risk, and on employers that retaliate against employees who complain about unsafe or unhealthy working conditions. This means industries with a high risk for COVID-19 hazards, such as hospitals, retirement facilities, grocery stores, restaurants, correctional facilities, as well as other industries in general, can expect more frequent, in-person inspections and stricter enforcement of OSHA standards and regulations, with possible fines for non-compliance as well.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have already seen an uptick in employee complaints alleging that they have been retaliated against for voicing their concerns about COVID-19 hazards in the workplace. This happened more often to employers who had an in-person workforce during the pandemic. Now, we are seeing more complaints arise among the employers that allowed remote work during the pandemic who are now bringing people back into the office. Some of those employees do not yet want to return and are claiming they have been retaliated against for complaining that the workplace environment is not safe enough to return to. As a result, during this sensitive transitional period, employers must ensure they are especially clear about the reasons underlying any action they take against employees and are careful not to retaliate against their workers for voicing such concerns.
The NLRA also affords workers the right to act together to address work-related issues, such as safety concerns in the workplace. Two or more employees banding together to discuss these work-related issues – or one employee acting on behalf of the group – is considered a protected concerted activity under the Act. During the time of COVID-19, a protected concerted activity can take the form of: openly calling for paid sick leave; circulating a petition asking for stronger health and safety protections; employees requesting to work-from-home or requesting not to return to the office after having been working remotely due to risks surrounding COVID-19; employees garnering support to walk out in protest of critically unsafe working conditions; employees discussing or protesting against a mandatory vaccination policy (or the lack thereof); and the like.
Similar to the protections under OSHA, under the NLRA, an employer cannot lawfully interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees about their protected concerted activity or the exercise of other rights under the Act. So, as with OSHA, employers need to be extra cautious right now that they are clear about the reasons underlying any action they take against employees who raise concerns relating to safety and COVID-19. In establishing COVID-19 protocols in the workplace, an employer can abide by both OSHA and the NLRA regulations by implementing protocols that balance health and safety measures while being cautious not to infringe on protected activities. Best practices of this can include implementing a “social distance policy” in the workplace that encourages workers to maintain six-feet of distance when conversing with one another, but not instructing employees to not communicate with each other at all; or by discouraging the sharing of communal office supplies and printed materials to avoid the transmission of COVID-19, but not instructing employees that they are prohibited from distributing or sharing written materials altogether.
Although employers are ready to see a return to normalcy and bring their workforce back in full swing, we are not out of the woods quite yet. While the coronavirus pandemic continues to persist, employers need to be cautiously aware of the safety and wellbeing of their workplace and employees, and be careful not to punish employees for actions that look like exercising a right under OSHA or the NLRA.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Dina G. Aouad | Read Bio
About Jennings, Strouss & Salmon, P.L.C.
For over 75 years, Jennings Strouss has been dedicated to providing clients with strategic legal guidance to help them seize every opportunity. The firm is well-known for its rich heritage, commitment to community, and long-lasting relationships. We have a deep understanding of business and law. When you work with us, you’ll have a team of legal experts who are dedicated to your vision of success.
Through our offices in Phoenix, Peoria, and Tucson, Arizona, and Washington, D.C., we leverage resources both regionally and nationally to serve our expanding client base. Jennings Strouss is deeply rooted in each of our locations’ legal and business communities, and is especially instrumental in helping shape the dynamic growth of Arizona and many of its institutions. The firm promotes a pragmatic, results-oriented approach, coupled with a healthy, well-managed, and friendly atmosphere of collaboration.
Our primary areas of practice include advertising and media law; agribusiness; automobile dealership law; bankruptcy, restructuring, and creditors’ rights; construction; corporate and securities; eminent domain and condemnation; employee benefits and pensions; energy; estate planning and probate; family law and domestic relations; finance; healthcare; insurance defense; intellectual property; labor and employment; legal ethics; litigation; medical malpractice; mergers and acquisitions; professional liability defense; real estate; surety and fidelity; and tax.